discuss: part of the review?


Previous by date: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000 Re: part of the review?, jdd
Next by date: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000 Re: I give up, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000 Re: part of the review?, jdd
Next in thread: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill

Subject: Re: part of the review?
From: Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107080928220.16496-100000@commandprompt.com>

>5) I have asked several times for a _complete_ package with any graphic small
>word processor allowing Docbook but this seems impossible
>
>6) if Docbook become mandatory, I will stop writing for LDP. Should be a
>shame.

I assure you that the Docbook becoming mandatory an Docbook becoming
exclusive are two different things. DocBook could be considered mandatory
right now, but it is not exclusive.

J


>
>there are no reason to break a working system.
>
>jdd
>
>

-- 
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt	- http://www.commandprompt.com	</COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.	- http://www.opendocs.org	</PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts 	- http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP		- http://www.linuxdoc.org	</WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--


Previous by date: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000 Re: part of the review?, jdd
Next by date: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000 Re: I give up, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000 Re: part of the review?, jdd
Next in thread: 8 Jul 2001 16:30:43 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.