discuss: where is ipnatctl??
Subject:
Re: where is ipnatctl??
From:
Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date:
7 Jul 2001 23:31:18 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107071630350.2296-100000@commandprompt.com>
I would suspect that it was quiet DROP ;)
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, Hal Burgiss wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 01:14:54PM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
>>
>> Yeah we have contacted him several times, to no avail.
>
>Was this a quiet 'DROP' or a 'REJECT'? ;)
>
>These look to be licensed under the GPL. Is there anything wrong with
>incorporating these as is? Realizing of course, it is more desirable
>to have his active consent and participation, but reproduction would
>seem to be permissable.
>
>IMHO, these are the definitive reference on iptables, and seems to me
>it leaves a gaping hole in the current collection.
>
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
