discuss: Quality (Was: Re: Modifiability of documentation and software)
Subject:
Re: Quality (Was: Re: Modifiability of documentation and software)
From:
Rahul Sundaram ####@####.####
Date:
28 Feb 2005 09:45:48 -0000
Message-Id: <20050228093630.35823.qmail@web8505.mail.in.yahoo.com>
--- Machtelt Garrels ####@####.#### wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, David Lawyer wrote:
>
> > The reason RedHat dropped our docs was due to them
> being outdated (I
> > think they complained about quality). The
> non-modifiability issue had
> > nothing to do with it. So I think that
> modifiability has nothing to do
> > with getting our docs back in distributions.
>
> That was a while ago, I think. Wouldn't it be good
> to contact them and
> explain about the procedures that we created in
> order to ensure the
> quality of our documents?
>
> Tille.
Let me take care of that. Machtelt, whats your opinion
on modifiability as a requirement?
=====
Regards
Rahul Sundaram
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
