discuss: Quality (Was: Re: Modifiability of documentation and software)
Subject:
Quality (Was: Re: Modifiability of documentation and software)
From:
Machtelt Garrels ####@####.####
Date:
28 Feb 2005 09:16:06 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0502280913390.21663-100000@cobra.xalasys.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, David Lawyer wrote:
> The reason RedHat dropped our docs was due to them being outdated (I
> think they complained about quality). The non-modifiability issue had
> nothing to do with it. So I think that modifiability has nothing to do
> with getting our docs back in distributions.
That was a while ago, I think. Wouldn't it be good to contact them and
explain about the procedures that we created in order to ensure the
quality of our documents?
Tille.
- --
My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.xalasys.com
Books: http://writers.fultus.com/garrels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCIuKCsIIUbMXbBA8RAj2RAKCqH+h54PaJfDiXk4NXwwymPBqPjgCdGZsO
mqhL6ATvtpxhHGMeOD71ef0=
=inVb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
