discuss: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion


Previous by date: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000 Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion, Michael T Kerrisk
Next by date: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000 Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion, Michael T Kerrisk
Previous in thread: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000 Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion, Michael T Kerrisk
Next in thread: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000 Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion, Michael T Kerrisk

Subject: Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion
From: "Michael T Kerrisk" ####@####.####
Date: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000
Message-Id: <12399.1109558440@www33.gmx.net>

> [snip]
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 03:48:01PM +1100, Gareth Anderson wrote:
> > Many of the commands were taken from man pages.
> > 
> > So its possible that I've used a bad source or got lucky when testing
> > the commands as somone pointed out (David?) with the tr command.
> > 
> > " It's already been reviewed by a
> > > sampling review by 2 persons and it failed.  "
> > 
> > 1 reviewer helped correct grammatical and found a couple technical
> > errors (probably one or two). This reviewer did run out of time to get
> > through the entire document, it is very large.
> > 
> > The second reviewer found style mistakes in the way I write. I
> > attempted to correct those errors throughout the document.
> > 
> > If you are referring to brief glances over the document, yes 3 or 4
> > errors have being found.
> > There are ~100 commands listed there, so a 3-4% error rate so far.
> > No I'm not trying to say its acceptable, I will try to fix it.
> 
> But my sampling of it found about a 100% error rate.  Some commands were
> OK but others had a couple of errors.  I only sampled about 1% of the
> doc and found a few errors, but the xargs errors were really bad ones.
> I just now took another sample of a couple of commands and found a
> few errors.  So I still think that the error rate is approximately 100%
> That's far too large to be acceptable.

Yes.  To reiterate: David and I have both indicated that there
are likely *many* errors, but pointed out only a few of the
more obvious ones.

Cheers,

Michael

-- 
Michael Kerrisk
####@####.####

DSL Komplett von GMX +++ Supergünstig und stressfrei einsteigen!
AKTION "Kein Einrichtungspreis" nutzen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

Previous by date: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000 Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion, Michael T Kerrisk
Next by date: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000 Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion, Michael T Kerrisk
Previous in thread: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000 Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion, Michael T Kerrisk
Next in thread: 28 Feb 2005 02:41:07 -0000 Re: GNU Linux Command Line Tools Summary Ready for inclusion, Michael T Kerrisk


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.