discuss: part of the review?
Subject:
Re: part of the review?
From:
Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date:
7 Jul 2001 20:18:14 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107071315100.32552-100000@commandprompt.com>
Hello,
It makes sense as a natural progression to move to DocBook. It will
happen it just takes time for everyone to be comfortable with it. This is
why I suggest the following:
1. All new authors must use DocBook
2. If a new author is taking over an unmaintained document that is in
LinuxDoc. The author may opt to use LinuxDoc.
3. Existing documents that are in LinuxDoc may be kept in LinuxDoc, but
you should move your document to DocBook when possible.
4. All NEW documents should be in Docbook. We can use the simplified
DocBook DTD if required.
J
On Sat, 7 Jul 2001, jdd wrote:
>Le Samedi 7 Juillet 2001 03:07, David Merrill a écrit :
>
>> > please keed linuxdoc.
>>
>> We aren't going to start *refusing* linuxdoc submissions. The point is
>> that we are going to do everything we can do encourage using docbook.
>
>this is perfectly nice. I will probably switch to docbook a day or an other.
>but when?
>
>jdd
>
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
