discuss: Inconsistent submission information
Subject:
Re: Inconsistent submission information
From:
Rahul Sundaram ####@####.####
Date:
15 Feb 2005 00:34:53 -0000
Message-Id: <20050215003425.24413.qmail@web8503.mail.in.yahoo.com>
--- Edward Cherlin ####@####.#### wrote:
> The page
> http://www.tldp.org/mailinfo.html
> says
> ####@####.#### - general (document) submits
> address; list
> designed for one-way communication from authors to
> LDP staff for
> submission of new or updated document (but anyone
> can
> subscribe). Remember that we prefer CVS for new
> submits,
> followed by a message to ####@####.####
>
> However, the page
>
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/process.html
> says
>
> Submit your document for technical, language and
> metadata
> reviews. Do this by emailing your document to
> ####@####.#### In the subject line be sure
> give the title
> of the document. In the body of the email say that
> you are ready
> for the review process. Outline any additional
> reviews your
> document may have already received. You should be
> assigned a
> reviewer within the week. The reviews may take an
> additional
> week each. For more information about this process,
> please read
> Chapter 6.
>
> If your document is not already in DocBook or
> LinuxDoc format, a
> reviewer will convert it for you.
>
> Once your document has been through each of the
> reviews a Review
> Coordinator will add it to the CVS, update the
> version number to
> 1.0 and have the document published on the public
> Web site. For
> more information about your final submission to the
> LDP, please
> read Section 6.5.
maybe I am missing something but can you please
explain whats inconsistent about these instructions?
=====
Regards
Rahul Sundaram
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
