discuss: Inconsistent submission information
Subject:
Inconsistent submission information
From:
Edward Cherlin ####@####.####
Date:
15 Feb 2005 00:30:35 -0000
Message-Id: <200502141635.34434.edward.cherlin@etssg.com>
The page
http://www.tldp.org/mailinfo.html
says
####@####.#### - general (document) submits address; list
designed for one-way communication from authors to LDP staff for
submission of new or updated document (but anyone can
subscribe). Remember that we prefer CVS for new submits,
followed by a message to ####@####.####
However, the page
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/process.html
says
Submit your document for technical, language and metadata
reviews. Do this by emailing your document to
####@####.#### In the subject line be sure give the title
of the document. In the body of the email say that you are ready
for the review process. Outline any additional reviews your
document may have already received. You should be assigned a
reviewer within the week. The reviews may take an additional
week each. For more information about this process, please read
Chapter 6.
If your document is not already in DocBook or LinuxDoc format, a
reviewer will convert it for you.
Once your document has been through each of the reviews a Review
Coordinator will add it to the CVS, update the version number to
1.0 and have the document published on the public Web site. For
more information about your final submission to the LDP, please
read Section 6.5.
--
Edward Cherlin, Simputer Evangelist
Encore Technologies (S) Pte. Ltd.
The Village Information Society
http://cherlin.blogspot.com
