discuss: Anonymous CVS Access


Previous by date: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000 Re: Anonymous CVS Access, Rick Moen
Next by date: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000 Re: Anonymous CVS Access, G Ferguson / LDP
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000 Re: Anonymous CVS Access, Rick Moen
Next in thread: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000 Re: Anonymous CVS Access, G Ferguson / LDP

Subject: Re: Anonymous CVS Access
From: Emma Jane Hogbin ####@####.####
Date: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000
Message-Id: <20041005164344.GD8557@smeagol>

On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:13:00AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
> Pardon my interjection, but:  The original poster wasn't talking about
> access with ability to update files in the CVS, but rather anonymous
> access, which is public, read-only access analogous to anonymous ftp.

Ahh, I read it incorrectly, you're right. If there was a change in the
read-only CVS access, it was not announced. The problem with using the CVS
as the most up-to-date version of a document is that it often has articles
that are not yet ready for publication because they have technical errors
in them. My ACPI is a prime example. I will often keep a working draft in
the CVS in case I lose my local version. The working draft is definitely
NOT ready to be read by others though.

Perhaps Tille or Greg can post information on how to get the published files
off the system through whatever techniques the mirrors use?

emma

-- 
Emma Jane Hogbin
I18N Coordinator, The Linux Documentation Project
www.tldp.org

Previous by date: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000 Re: Anonymous CVS Access, Rick Moen
Next by date: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000 Re: Anonymous CVS Access, G Ferguson / LDP
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000 Re: Anonymous CVS Access, Rick Moen
Next in thread: 5 Oct 2004 16:36:34 -0000 Re: Anonymous CVS Access, G Ferguson / LDP


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.