discuss: Compiling HOWTO, take 5
Subject:
Re: Compiling HOWTO, take 5
From:
Rahul Sundaram ####@####.####
Date:
5 Oct 2004 11:24:49 -0000
Message-Id: <20041005112421.5601.qmail@web8509.mail.in.yahoo.com>
--- "Ruth A. Kramer" ####@####.#### wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > looks better than before but are you planning to
> > expand this?. It looks too short now.
>
> Apologies in advance, but I hope we don't develop
> length as a review
> criteria.
Not at all. Its just my opinion that a howto called as
"compiling howto" should be much more broader. Of
course this is not a review criteria. It would just be
more interesting to me *personally* if the howto had
more details. someone else can jump in and do the
review if not
>
> And, I apologize, because your next point might be
> very appropriate, but
> I suspect you left out a word or two and I'm not
> sure what your point
> is.
Yes. didnt realise it could be misinterpreted. happens
pretty much frequently
regards
Rahul Sundaram
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
