discuss: rating system


Previous by date: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000 Re: Reviews required: LPI Certification Self-Study Guide, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000 Final Reviews Required: Spam Filtering for Mail Exhangers (2nd request), Tor Slettnes
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000 Re: rating system, Christopher Priest
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000 Re: rating system, Christopher Priest

Subject: Re: rating system
From: Rahul Sundaram ####@####.####
Date: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000
Message-Id: <20040715192445.70997.qmail@web8207.mail.in.yahoo.com>

--- Christopher Priest ####@####.#### wrote:
> My two cents to get the ball rolling.
> 
> First rating would be beginner, intermediate and
> expert. The author can
> assign it.
> 


This would be more appropriately called classification
of the documents which is independant from a quality
rating. This seems to be a good idea to implement. We
can probably add a tag which specifies this and put an
example in the sample documents including specifying a
guideline in the author guide

regards
Rahul Sundaram


		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

Previous by date: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000 Re: Reviews required: LPI Certification Self-Study Guide, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000 Final Reviews Required: Spam Filtering for Mail Exhangers (2nd request), Tor Slettnes
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000 Re: rating system, Christopher Priest
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2004 22:21:14 -0000 Re: rating system, Christopher Priest


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.