discuss: Re: [Fwd: Re: LSM in Bordeaux]
Subject:
Re: [Fwd: Re: LSM in Bordeaux]
From:
doug jensen ####@####.####
Date:
14 Jul 2004 17:44:38 -0000
Message-Id: <20040714174404.GA11532@debian>
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:12:37AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Gu?rard wrote:
> "Posted by Guylhem Aznar on the 2004-06-24 19:51
>
> The problem with traduc.org is that *it* is isolated.
>
> The Italian, Spanish and even Korean LDP have tried to unit their
> strengths. Some people of the LDP had even tried to link with traduc.org
> by creating fr.tldp.org - this did not work out as a consequence of what
> was described to me as a visible reluctance to help.
>
> It is therefore a nice isolated French translation community that was
> thus created. And this is this spirit of isolated communities I am
> criticizing - not traduc.org."
Why can't TLDP cooperate without requiring a name change?
It appears that the Traduc.org association has different criteria for
including documentation than TLDP. Maybe they don't want to include all
of the broken documents that are included in TLDP. Maybe they just want
to select documents based on licensing criteria. Calling Traduc.org
association an "isolated community" doesn't seem very useful, unless
your goal is to build an impire.
--
Doug Jensen
