discuss: Re: [Fwd: Re: LSM in Bordeaux]
Subject:
Re: [Fwd: Re: LSM in Bordeaux]
From:
doug jensen ####@####.####
Date:
11 Jul 2004 20:15:20 -0000
Message-Id: <20040711201443.GA5909@debian>
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 12:43:53PM -0300, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> On Friday 09 July 2004 03:04, Jean-Philippe Gu?rard wrote:
> > Could you be more precise? Interoperability with who? Will the new
> > LDP license be free under the definition of the Debian project? Do
> > you mean that the official translation projects will be the only
> > ones allowed to translate LDP documents?
>
> I won't agree with restricting translations to TLDP "official" members
> only. I think other people think the same way.
>
> DFSG is more focused on *software*. This is also one of the reasons
> there are free documentation licenses that focuses on *documentation*
> particularities.
The DFSG is focused on all software, programs and documentation, equally.
That was validated by a recent vote of the Debian developers.
Documentation with restrictive licenses will be removed after the next
stable release. IMHO this is only fair, to apply the same rules to all
contributions.
--
Doug Jensen
