discuss: Documentation licensing


Previous by date: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Ferg / LDP
Previous in thread: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next in thread: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Ferg / LDP

Subject: Re: Documentation Licensing
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" ####@####.####
Date: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000
Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.0.20040412191101.0268fc20@mail.simpaticus.com>

At 18:36 4/12/2004, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>  --- "Rodolfo J. Paiz" ####@####.#### wrote: >
> > Just out of curiosity, why is it that everyone cares
> > so much about Debian guidelines?
>
>Its important for people to care about those
>guidelines if they have any respect for free software.

<grin> No offense, Rahul, but that particular answer boils down to "this is 
the right way and anyone who is one of Us will do it this way." I was 
looking for a little more of the "why"... I have already concluded that 
many people regard them as being a good guide.

>debian is one of the few volunteer distributions with
>a very active community of developers and users.

<evil grin> Then why is Debian "stable" so damned old? <ducks for cover>


-- 
Rodolfo J. Paiz
####@####.####
http://www.simpaticus.com


Previous by date: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Ferg / LDP
Previous in thread: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next in thread: 13 Apr 2004 01:22:13 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Ferg / LDP


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.