discuss: Documentation licensing


Previous by date: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rick Moen
Previous in thread: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next in thread: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rick Moen

Subject: Re: Documentation Licensing
From: Mary Gardiner ####@####.####
Date: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000
Message-Id: <20040412220941.GA16401@puzzling.org>

On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 08:58:51PM +0930, Glen Turner wrote:
> Interestingly, those legal advisors did "get" free software. They just
> had a life-cycle view of copyrights -- they felt that if we maintained
> a HOWTO then we should hold strict control over the contents. And when
> we wished to cease maintaining the HOWTO we should assign the
> copyright to the LDP.

I thought copyright assignment to the LDP was impossible, as the LDP 
doesn't exist as any sort of legal entity. Is this correct?

-Mary

Previous by date: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rick Moen
Previous in thread: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next in thread: 12 Apr 2004 22:08:57 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rick Moen


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.