discuss: Documentation licensing
Subject:
Re: Documentation Licensing
From:
Rick Moen ####@####.####
Date:
11 Apr 2004 20:15:55 -0000
Message-Id: <20040411201553.GC19884@linuxmafia.com>
Quoting Rahul Sundaram ####@####.####
> I agree on all those points but there are still
> practical difficulties which we should work on.
Thank you. I've basically had my say on the matter. Forkable documents
should be preferred: They are. Where practical, non-forkable ones
should get replaced as ones better-suited arrive: They do.
Remaining details are matters that busy LDP volunteers can improve over
time, as they have time and energy.
> The existance of a LDP manifesto and insisting on implementing it is
> good but the current licensing requirements in my opinion is not
> optimal.
Such as that. ;->
--
Cheers, A: No.
Rick Moen Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
####@####.####
