discuss: Documentation licensing


Previous by date: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rick Moen
Previous in thread: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next in thread: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rick Moen

Subject: Re: Documentation Licensing
From: Rick Moen ####@####.####
Date: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000
Message-Id: <20040408205642.GY14644@linuxmafia.com>

Quoting Rahul Sundaram ####@####.####

> Hi

Howdy!

> can we point to creative commons attribution share
> alike license as the recommended license instead of
> the boilerplate one. The advantage of using it is that
> I dont need to go through the license everytime I find
> a document.

The boilerplate licence strikes me as pretty good, and short.  But
certainly I have great respect for CC's Attribution-ShareAlike 1.0
piece, and see nothing wrong with linking to it as the recommended
licence.

-- 
Cheers,        "Linux means never having to delete your love mail."
Rick Moen                                              -- Don Marti
####@####.####

Previous by date: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rick Moen
Previous in thread: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rahul Sundaram
Next in thread: 8 Apr 2004 20:57:00 -0000 Re: Documentation Licensing, Rick Moen


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.