discuss: BASH programming
Subject:
Re: BASH programming
From:
"Rodolfo J. Paiz" ####@####.####
Date:
30 Jan 2004 18:25:24 -0000
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040130121932.024a0780@mail.simpaticus.com>
At 10:18 1/30/2004, Saqib Ali wrote:
>Looking good:
>http://www.xml-dev.com:8080/tldp/http://cvsview.tldp.org/index.cgi/*checkout*/LDP/howto/docbook/Intro-Bash-Scripting-HOWTO.xml
May I suggest that, for listing purposes, the filename be changed to
"Bash-Scripting-Intro-HOWTO"? Most people will look for this document in
the "B" part of the document listings, where those happen to be alphabetic.
Also, and while it may just be my anal side surfacing, I find both
"introduction to bash scripting" and "bash scripting introduction" to be
easy to understand and grammatically correct. However, the abbreviation
"intro" is usually taken to be for "introduction" and
"intro-bash-scripting" would be correct if it stood for "introductory" bash
scripting instead.
Anyhoo... just my two bits: "Bash-Scripting-Intro-HOWTO" just feels better
to me. Take it or leave it as you wish.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
####@####.####
http://www.simpaticus.com
