discuss: Revision History, Revisited (Again)
Subject:
Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again)
From:
Tabatha Marshall ####@####.####
Date:
27 Jan 2004 22:39:18 -0000
Message-Id: <1075243129.11610.12.camel@mysticchild>
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 21:49, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:47:52PM -0600, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> > At 14:42 1/23/2004, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> > >On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:24:06PM -0800, Tabatha Marshall wrote:
> > >> For those who are uncomfortable with the space consumption, keeping at
> > >> least one or two of the most recent rev entries at the top and storing
> > >> the rest in an appendix, like you suggest above, is probably the
> > >> cleanest way of handling it.
> > >
> > >The cleanest way of handling it is to fix the DSSSL so that only a
> > >specific number of revision history items are displayed.
> >
> > Um... shouldn't that "DSSSL" be "XSL"?
>
> Why? The LDP uses DSSSL for its transformations, NOT XSL.
Hehe...I'm glad I didn't waste bandwidth reiterating that, thanks!
If we change the DSSSL we probably should change the XSLs as well, so
that they are available for folks to use in processing locally. I'm
just starting to delve a little deeper into the whole stylesheet thing,
so it would be nice if it was available on the site for download. :D
I'm betting someone's already said this too though!
Tab
--
Tabatha Marshall
Web: www.merlinmonroe.com
Linux Documentation Project Review Coordinator (http://www.tldp.org)
Linux Counter Area Manager US:wa (http://counter.li.org)
