discuss: Revision History, Revisited (Again)
Subject:
Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again)
From:
Tabatha Marshall ####@####.####
Date:
27 Jan 2004 22:36:16 -0000
Message-Id: <1075242948.11606.8.camel@mysticchild>
On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 21:47, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> At 14:42 1/23/2004, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:24:06PM -0800, Tabatha Marshall wrote:
> > > For those who are uncomfortable with the space consumption, keeping at
> > > least one or two of the most recent rev entries at the top and storing
> > > the rest in an appendix, like you suggest above, is probably the
> > > cleanest way of handling it.
> >
> >The cleanest way of handling it is to fix the DSSSL so that only a
> >specific number of revision history items are displayed.
>
> Um... shouldn't that "DSSSL" be "XSL"?
Both! :D
--
Tabatha Marshall
Web: www.merlinmonroe.com
Linux Documentation Project Review Coordinator (http://www.tldp.org)
Linux Counter Area Manager US:wa (http://counter.li.org)
