discuss: Revision History, Revisited (Again)
Subject:
Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again)
From:
"Rodolfo J. Paiz" ####@####.####
Date:
24 Jan 2004 05:47:55 -0000
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040123234634.0250b570@mail.simpaticus.com>
At 14:42 1/23/2004, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:24:06PM -0800, Tabatha Marshall wrote:
> > For those who are uncomfortable with the space consumption, keeping at
> > least one or two of the most recent rev entries at the top and storing
> > the rest in an appendix, like you suggest above, is probably the
> > cleanest way of handling it.
>
>The cleanest way of handling it is to fix the DSSSL so that only a
>specific number of revision history items are displayed.
Um... shouldn't that "DSSSL" be "XSL"?
P.S. I agree. Keep the structure of DocBook intact and complete, and do
transformation issues in the stylesheets where they were meant to go.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
####@####.####
http://www.simpaticus.com
