discuss: Revision History, Revisited (Again)
Subject:
Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again)
From:
Tobias Reif ####@####.####
Date:
23 Jan 2004 22:07:34 -0000
Message-Id: <20040123220951.GA5685@linux>
Hi Tabatha
On Fri 2004-01-23 Tabatha Marshall wrote:
> Actually, pursuing a change with DocBook may be a little premature,
> given the solution to adjust the DSSSL. And don't get me wrong, I
> think the revision history definitely belongs at the top.
You wrote "Ideally, DocBook would fix the revhistory so it could
appear within an appendix or another backmatter section." and "[...]
until DocBook's makers change the standards [...]" so I thought you
want the DocBook TC to change something about DocBook (DocBook TDG and
the DTDs, XSDs, and RNGs).
> [...] I am comfortable with the markup - just trying to address the
> clutter that can occur in the revision history.
I agree that the moving parts of the revision history away from the
front in the transformation step is one good solution (AFAICS).
Tobi
--
Vim users, don't forget to
http://iccf-holland.org/donate.html
