| Previous by date: | 23 Jan 2004 20:56:59 -0000 Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again), Emma Jane Hogbin |
| Next by date: | 23 Jan 2004 20:56:59 -0000 Re: oxygen XML edit/validation/conversion tool, Saqib Ali |
| Previous in thread: | 23 Jan 2004 20:56:59 -0000 Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again), Emma Jane Hogbin |
| Next in thread: | 23 Jan 2004 20:56:59 -0000 Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again), Tabatha Marshall |
Hi Tabatha On Fri 2004-01-23 Tabatha Marshall wrote: > I don't want to stir things up about the types of markup and their > merits or detriments. But we do need a revhistory in the proper > place. Ideally, DocBook would fix the revhistory so it could appear > within an appendix or another backmatter section. However, the > structure of DocBook documents has become a de facto standard, and > until DocBook's makers change the standards to something else, we > should be using it as it was designed to be used. "DocBook's makers" (the DocBook TC [1]) can't "fix the revhistory" if they don't know about your requirements. If you have suggestions (such as allowing a certain element in new places/contexts), you can discuss them at the DocBook list [2] and/or submit an RFE at sf.net [3]. Tobi [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=docbook [2] http://www.docbook.org/wiki/moin.cgi/DocBookMailingList [3] https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=384107&group_id=21935&func=browse -- Vim users, don't forget to http://iccf-holland.org/donate.html
| Previous by date: | 23 Jan 2004 20:56:59 -0000 Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again), Emma Jane Hogbin |
| Next by date: | 23 Jan 2004 20:56:59 -0000 Re: oxygen XML edit/validation/conversion tool, Saqib Ali |
| Previous in thread: | 23 Jan 2004 20:56:59 -0000 Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again), Emma Jane Hogbin |
| Next in thread: | 23 Jan 2004 20:56:59 -0000 Re: Revision History, Revisited (Again), Tabatha Marshall |