discuss: Re: Quality Control


Previous by date: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000 Re: WHATIS wiki available (was Re: WHATIS documents), John R. Daily
Next by date: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000 Re: Quality Control, jdd
Previous in thread: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000 Re: Quality Control, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000 Re: Quality Control, jdd

Subject: Re: Quality Control
From: rahul ####@####.####
Date: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000
Message-Id: <3FDE850B.2000502@yahoo.co.in>

David Lawyer wrote:

>>>>I don't agree.  The poor quality of our documents led to their rejection
>>>>by Redhat.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>I question that. seen the difficulty of review, I fear Red Hat never 
>>reviewed our docs.
>>    
>>
>
>While RedHat didn't review them, they got complaints (mostly out-of-date
>complaints) about them from readers.
>			David Lawyer
>
>______________________
>http://lists.tldp.org/
>
>  
>
OK. Is it possible to seperate the good documents first and propose that 
they accept it?

Regards
Rahul Sundaram

Previous by date: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000 Re: WHATIS wiki available (was Re: WHATIS documents), John R. Daily
Next by date: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000 Re: Quality Control, jdd
Previous in thread: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000 Re: Quality Control, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 16 Dec 2003 04:02:50 -0000 Re: Quality Control, jdd


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.