discuss: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary


Previous by date: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000 Re: Quality Control, rahul
Next by date: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, David Lawyer

Subject: Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary
From: doug jensen ####@####.####
Date: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000
Message-Id: <20031215060715.GA10634@ispwest.com>

On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 04:39:44AM +0000, Chris Karakas wrote:
> doug jensen ####@####.#### schrieb:
> >If there were no other considerations involved and you had to make a choice
> >between the ranking of your website and the quality of a document, which
> >would you choose?
> >
> 
> Unfortunately, I see that, even after three  very detailed posts of mine, I am still
> getting misunderstood here. :-(
> 
> Of course I choose quality. What question is this? Do you really think we are
> debating quality vs. ranking? Do you think I am telling you "do a trick"?

Your explanation of labels was clear.  You just hadn't mentioned quality
before.  I was just wondering.  Thanks for letting me know.


--
Doug Jensen

Previous by date: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000 Re: Quality Control, rahul
Next by date: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 15 Dec 2003 05:47:02 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, David Lawyer


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.