discuss: Re: Quality Control
Subject:
Re: Quality Control
From:
rahul ####@####.####
Date:
15 Dec 2003 05:31:50 -0000
Message-Id: <3FDD4747.5040309@yahoo.co.in>
Hi
>I don't agree. The poor quality of our documents led to their rejection
>by Redhat. It's also hurt us much more that just this. It's meant that
>the LDP docs are a lot less popular (based on the % of Linux Users that
>use them a lot). There was a lot of criticism of LDP docs on slash-dot
>in response to our recent euphemistic announcement of our 10th anniversary.
>Mistakes were made in the past by accepting some docs without review. I
>think that our motto should be not "the more docs the better" but
>"the more good docs the better".
>
>
Exactly. LDP recieved bad feedback on slashdot due to the percieved poor
quality of documentation. Every document that is going to be accepted in
the future should undergo some careful reviews. We should work on
revamping the outdated ones. A yearly review of documentation would also
be good(Tabatha's suggestion)
Regards
Rahul Sundaram
