discuss: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary


Previous by date: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, Chris Karakas
Next by date: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, rahul
Previous in thread: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, Chris Karakas
Next in thread: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, rahul

Subject: Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary
From: "Chris Karakas" ####@####.####
Date: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000
Message-Id: <20031214.yn1.50651200@www.karakas-online.de>

rahul ####@####.#### schrieb:
>
>Guru - wrote:
>>
>> I'm waiting for the debate about licenses to finish before I do
>> anything about the license.
>>
>
>Fine. Just wanted to make sure you are aware of the issues and choices

Rahul,

thanks for that document which you sent me too a few days ago. Since Guru does not
have invariant sections, I don't think there is a compelling reason to change the
licence now. My impression, even after reading that document, is that the bulk of
the critique is aimed at the invariant sections. I think, waiting for the debate to
settle, is a viable solution for those of us who are not licence lawyers.

--
--
Regards

Chris Karakas
http://www.karakas-online.de



Previous by date: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, Chris Karakas
Next by date: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, rahul
Previous in thread: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, Chris Karakas
Next in thread: 14 Dec 2003 11:02:04 -0000 Re: Review of GNU/Linux Tools Summary, rahul


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.