discuss: status of document


Previous by date: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000 Re: GNU/Linux Command-Line Tools Summary needs either reviewing or acceptance, Chris Karakas
Next by date: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000 Re: GNU/Linux Command-Line Tools Summary needs either reviewing or acceptance, rahul
Previous in thread: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000 Re: status of document, rahul
Next in thread: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000 Re: status of document, David Lawyer

Subject: Re: status of document
From: doug jensen ####@####.####
Date: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000
Message-Id: <20031212120933.GA5326@ispwest.com>

On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 11:45:12PM +0530, rahul wrote:
> doug jensen wrote:
> 
> >On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 07:46:46PM +0530, rahul wrote:
> If the author has informed you that he/she is not interested in 
> maintaining the document, it can be conveyed to tabatha or david and 
> they can move the document to the unmaintained list.

That would take care of two, if I remember correctly.  Does anyone have
any other ideas?

--
Doug Jensen

Previous by date: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000 Re: GNU/Linux Command-Line Tools Summary needs either reviewing or acceptance, Chris Karakas
Next by date: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000 Re: GNU/Linux Command-Line Tools Summary needs either reviewing or acceptance, rahul
Previous in thread: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000 Re: status of document, rahul
Next in thread: 12 Dec 2003 11:50:25 -0000 Re: status of document, David Lawyer


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.