discuss: Re: Review process inconsistencies


Previous by date: 10 Dec 2003 18:41:29 -0000 Re: Review process inconsistencies, Machtelt Garrels
Next by date: 10 Dec 2003 18:41:29 -0000 Re: Review needed of 'Encourage Women in Linux' HOWTO, Val Henson
Previous in thread: 10 Dec 2003 18:41:29 -0000 Re: Review process inconsistencies, Machtelt Garrels
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: Review process inconsistencies
From: jdd ####@####.####
Date: 10 Dec 2003 18:41:29 -0000
Message-Id: <3FD768D7.4070003@dodin.net>

Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:

> I'm not interesting in volunteering for a system where a document is,
> "very easy to find." Either it is in the CVS, or it is mailed to me
> directly. I should not have to hunt down a document which I have
> volunteered to review. Period.

I didn't notice you where speaking as a reviewer on the discuss list. I 
think the problem should have been written to the edit one. most HOWTO 
reviewed are _not_ yet public and so are sent to reviewer directly.

if this was not done for you it's an error

jdd


-- 
http://www.dodin.net



Previous by date: 10 Dec 2003 18:41:29 -0000 Re: Review process inconsistencies, Machtelt Garrels
Next by date: 10 Dec 2003 18:41:29 -0000 Re: Review needed of 'Encourage Women in Linux' HOWTO, Val Henson
Previous in thread: 10 Dec 2003 18:41:29 -0000 Re: Review process inconsistencies, Machtelt Garrels
Next in thread:


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.