discuss: Re: Review process inconsistencies
Subject:
Re: Review process inconsistencies
From:
Machtelt Garrels ####@####.####
Date:
10 Dec 2003 18:07:47 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312101205180.10779-100000@server1.us.soti.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
> I would seriously suggest that a simple voting mechanism be created, a list
> of people who can vote added, and a weight assigned to each vote. For
> example, LDP staff and editors could have a weight of 2 while the rest of
> us who at least care enough to be here get 1. Then, when we make decisions,
> you know who voted, how they voted, and exactly why the result was what it
> was. And we give importance to the opinions of those who contribute the
> most to LDP.
Apart from anything else, asigning votes with a relative weight on a per
person basis is a very undemocratic thing to do. History proves it comes
to no good.
Tille.
- --
My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.soti.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/12DrsIIUbMXbBA8RArSXAJ45RW5cUiaWMnTm6t2PdXGlJuAgLwCfc9dF
mKqvLEuRhHh0uXqPTwGcQYM=
=azIY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
