discuss: Re: Review process inconsistencies
Subject:
Re: Review process inconsistencies
From:
Emma Jane Hogbin ####@####.####
Date:
10 Dec 2003 17:56:40 -0000
Message-Id: <20031210175610.GB3001@debian>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 06:35:54PM +0100, jdd wrote:
> there was a very large consensus about the Al case, discussed in length.
> Decision was good and as I said in a preceding mail the offending
> document was _very easy to find_, google helping.
I'm not interesting in volunteering for a system where a document is,
"very easy to find." Either it is in the CVS, or it is mailed to me
directly. I should not have to hunt down a document which I have
volunteered to review. Period.
emma
--
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]
