discuss: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc


Previous by date: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, David Lawyer
Next by date: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000 Sorry for late replies, Tabatha Marshall
Previous in thread: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, Stein Gjoen

Subject: Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc
From: Emma Jane Hogbin ####@####.####
Date: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000
Message-Id: <20031209215439.GF12032@debian>

On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:47:26PM -0800, David Lawyer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:46:17AM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> > I'm working on the Author Guide (still, again, etc). I need a really
> > easy-to-understand, simple, (etc) reason why newbie authors should choose
> > LinuxDoc over DocBook.
> 
> I could try to write something on this topic and then put it on my
> website or add it to my mini-howto.

Either would be great! I'm not in any rush. When it's ready, I'll add it
as appropriate. It may be before Author Guide is released, or it may be as
an update afterward...

emma

-- 
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]

Previous by date: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, David Lawyer
Next by date: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000 Sorry for late replies, Tabatha Marshall
Previous in thread: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 9 Dec 2003 21:55:07 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, Stein Gjoen


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.