discuss: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc
Subject:
Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc
From:
Emma Jane Hogbin ####@####.####
Date:
9 Dec 2003 18:08:39 -0000
Message-Id: <20031209180812.GA10082@debian>
Ok, I think I must have been unclear in my first email.
Please send me the URL of a document that authors can read which explains
why LinuxDoc is a good/easy/etc alternative to DocBook. I already know
about David's document, I'm looking for something else.
Please note: I will ignore all emails that do not include a URL. This is
not about /should we/ do something--the LinuxDoc markup language is
currently accepted by the LDP as one of the (many) acceptable formats for
submitting documents. I'm not interested in the arguments for or against.
This isn't about LinuxDoc, per se, it's about me trying to get the Author
Guide finished.
thanks,
emma
--
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]
