discuss: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc


Previous by date: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, jdd
Next by date: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, Emma Jane Hogbin
Previous in thread: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, jdd
Next in thread: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, Emma Jane Hogbin

Subject: Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc
From: Saqib Ali ####@####.####
Date: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.55.0312090917070.21654@sjgcs1.stsj.seagate.com>

> You know, I figured Emma's request to not argue the merits of
> LinuxDoc would be ignored; I just didn't realize it would be
> the very first response that would do it.

John,

I am not arguing about the merits of the one or the other DTD. All I am
saying we need to standardize on one DTD, and reduce the variability.

Standardization and less-variability has its merits.

In Peace,
Saqib Ali
-------------
http://validate.sf.net <---- HTML/XHTML/DocBook Validator


Previous by date: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, jdd
Next by date: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, Emma Jane Hogbin
Previous in thread: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, jdd
Next in thread: 9 Dec 2003 17:35:37 -0000 Re: wanted: a really good case for LinuxDoc, Emma Jane Hogbin


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.