discuss: Feedback on LDPWN
Subject:
RE: Feedback on LDPWN
From:
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag ####@####.####
Date:
8 Dec 2003 11:31:11 -0000
Message-Id: <80A07E7023257741B258296933B7426C22137C@ubiinmbx01.ubinetics.co.in>
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>> http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20031112.html
>> Example: http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20030930.html
>
> More user-friendly URL's, perhaps?
> http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/interviews/Pawlowicz-Sergiusz-20030930.html
> Or:
> http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20030930.html#interview
>
> Just an idea.
Thank you :-)
Implemented. The current [1. template.xml] file (that is used for the bare
bones weekly newsletter) has proper section id tags to take care of this.
1. <http://cvs.tldp.org/index.cgi/LDP/ldpwn/template.xml>
>> The information contained in this email and any attachments
>> is likely to be confidential and legally privileged [...]
>
> Is it possible to avoid having this disclaimer removed from your
> posts to mailing lists? It is really unnecessary in this context, and
Kind of, but I am not allowed to do that :-(
> it's the largest legal disclaimer I have ever seen in my life (no
Then you did not see http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/35/19057.html
> exceptions at all). I can perfectly well understand that you would
> want and need this disclaimer for your business, but _we_ don't need
> to see it on every post, do we?
I will try my best. This email will not have the disclaimer ;-).
Giridhar
--
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag http://www.pratapgarh.com/appaji
Not that long disease, my life, but that long convalescence, my life.
The liberal-bourgeois revision, the illusion of improvement, the poison
of hope - Herzog
an individual are not necessarily those of UbiNetics
