discuss: Feedback on LDPWN
Subject:
Re: Feedback on LDPWN
From:
"Rodolfo J. Paiz" ####@####.####
Date:
29 Nov 2003 05:13:17 -0000
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031128230528.0250f6b8@mail.simpaticus.com>
At 01:13 11/28/2003, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
>It has been a few months since the LDP Weekly News was restarted. If you
>were following the issues, I was wondering if you have any feedback
>regarding the same?
>
>Comments on content, format, organisation, [anything-on-earth-related-to
>-the-ldpwn] are welcome.
I have only joined this group recently (I think less than two months ago),
and I was not aware of the LDPWN's existence at all. So first suggestion,
more visibility on the site itself. Second suggestion, offer to send it out
by mail rather than making it available only on the site.
>Example: http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20031125.html
>Example: http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20031118.html
>http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20031015.html
>http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20031112.html
>Example: http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20030930.html
More user-friendly URL's, perhaps?
http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/interviews/Pawlowicz-Sergiusz-20030930.html
Or:
http://www.tldp.org/ldpwn/20030930.html#interview
Just an idea.
>The information contained in this email and any attachments
>is likely to be confidential and legally privileged [...]
Is it possible to avoid having this disclaimer removed from your posts to
mailing lists? It is really unnecessary in this context, and it's the
largest legal disclaimer I have ever seen in my life (no exceptions at
all). I can perfectly well understand that you would want and need this
disclaimer for your business, but _we_ don't need to see it on every post,
do we?
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
####@####.####
