discuss: is revhistory _that_ needed?
Subject:
Re: is revhistory _that_ needed?
From:
David Lawyer ####@####.####
Date:
25 Nov 2003 19:30:33 -0000
Message-Id: <20031125180244.GA340@lafn.org>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:34:08AM +0200, Artemio wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just thought I should take the revision history away from my SquashFS HOWTO
> - just because it seems unneeded, as for me.
>
> Is it a requirement for all HOWTOs or it's okay to omit it?
I think that it's best to just have the whole revision history in the
source only (as a comment). Except that for the recent revisions
(within the past several months), I think they should also be in the
document. I don't think it's required to have a revision history.
David Lawyer
