discuss: is revhistory _that_ needed?
Subject:
Re: is revhistory _that_ needed?
From:
Machtelt Garrels ####@####.####
Date:
25 Nov 2003 16:22:30 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311250801440.22752-100000@server1.us.soti.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Artemio wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just thought I should take the revision history away from my SquashFS HOWTO
> - just because it seems unneeded, as for me.
>
> Is it a requirement for all HOWTOs or it's okay to omit it?
It's easy to have in a document, so that you don't need to check the CVS
for diffs when a new version is published.
Tille.
- --
My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.soti.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/w2D0sIIUbMXbBA8RApJzAJ9PQ9KlegGW/zYWtnzMw4wB0d0C0QCaAghB
meD7zU+U1kQB6xG5CvFaoyE=
=NSeI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
