discuss: is revhistory _that_ needed?
Subject:
Re: is revhistory _that_ needed?
From:
Artemio ####@####.####
Date:
25 Nov 2003 11:52:01 -0000
Message-Id: <200311251337.56401.theman@artemio.net>
jdd wrote:
> Artemio wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I just thought I should take the revision history away from my SquashFS
> > HOWTO - just because it seems unneeded, as for me.
> >
> > Is it a requirement for all HOWTOs or it's okay to omit it?
>
> when I formerly submitt my HOWTO without it, somebody add one.
>
> this was ridiculous (because completely uncommented, of course), but so
> I understand it was mandatory.
Okay, I got it.
I will now have to uncomment it in XML source I guess. :-)
> it's the only docbook tag LyX can't live with, so this was a real problem.
Hmmm, I write from scratch in KWrite :-P. Only yesterday I tried KXMLedit -
but I don't think I'll use it that much.
Artemio.
