discuss: is revhistory _that_ needed?
Subject:
Re: is revhistory _that_ needed?
From:
jdd ####@####.####
Date:
25 Nov 2003 08:17:48 -0000
Message-Id: <3FC31028.9030206@dodin.net>
Artemio wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just thought I should take the revision history away from my SquashFS HOWTO
> - just because it seems unneeded, as for me.
>
> Is it a requirement for all HOWTOs or it's okay to omit it?
when I formerly submitt my HOWTO without it, somebody add one.
this was ridiculous (because completely uncommented, of course), but so
I understand it was mandatory.
it's the only docbook tag LyX can't live with, so this was a real problem.
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
Me contacter avant d'envoyer une pièce jointe, merci.
Une chanteuse sur Toulouse?
http://valerie.dodin.net
