discuss: is revhistory _that_ needed?


Previous by date: 25 Nov 2003 07:37:35 -0000 Re: licenses, David Lawyer
Next by date: 25 Nov 2003 07:37:35 -0000 Re: new documentation license, jdd
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 25 Nov 2003 07:37:35 -0000 Re: is revhistory _that_ needed?, jdd

Subject: is revhistory _that_ needed?
From: Artemio ####@####.####
Date: 25 Nov 2003 07:37:35 -0000
Message-Id: <200311250934.08285.theman@artemio.net>

Hello!

I just thought I should take the revision history away from my SquashFS HOWTO 
- just because it seems unneeded, as for me.

Is it a requirement for all HOWTOs or it's okay to omit it?


Thanks!


Artemio.


Previous by date: 25 Nov 2003 07:37:35 -0000 Re: licenses, David Lawyer
Next by date: 25 Nov 2003 07:37:35 -0000 Re: new documentation license, jdd
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 25 Nov 2003 07:37:35 -0000 Re: is revhistory _that_ needed?, jdd


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.