discuss: gnu fdl
Subject:
gnu fdl
From:
rahul ####@####.####
Date:
13 Nov 2003 14:12:35 -0000
Message-Id: <200311131942.25586.rahulsundaram@yahoo.co.in>
hi
In case you have any doubt about this, RMS mailed me once about a document
that i had written which was licensed under FDL and told me that it was a
violation of the license if a copy itself wasnt included. He also
specifically told me that a link to the license is not sufficient. My LDP FAQ
is also affected by this. If I include a copy it becomes more than the actual
content itself. I am thinking of relicensing it under something different.
Any ideas?
if nobody suggests any particular license Tabatha please relicense it under
GPL for the next revision. oops! should i include a copy of the GPL then?
regards
rahul sundaram
