discuss: Keeping up-to-date (was Re: Document Lifetimes?)
Subject:
Re: Keeping up-to-date (was Re: Document Lifetimes?)
From:
Tabatha Marshall ####@####.####
Date:
13 Nov 2003 05:07:34 -0000
Message-Id: <1068700020.19226.108.camel@mysticchild>
Agreed on all!
Tab
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 20:40, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> Just some quick thoughts...
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:34:11PM -0800, Tabatha Marshall wrote:
> > 1. Presence of License & Copyright
> > 2. Presence of Metadata
> > -title
> > -author name
> > -author email
> > -organization (if any)
> > -contributors (if any)
> > -pub date (month and year)
> > -revhistory
> > -rev version
> > -date of revision
> > -author initials
> > -revision remarks
> > -abstract
> - coauthors
>
> > 3. Title and Abstract clearly describe and define document scope
> ^^^^^^^^ revised item
>
> > 4. Spelling
> > 5. Grammar
> > 6. Technical accuracy
> > 7. Clarity of text
> > 8. Organization of material
> > 9. Type of markup
> - valid markup
>
> 10. Original work -- do a quick google search to see if you can find the
> same document already online.
--
Tabatha Marshall
Web: www.merlinmonroe.com
Linux Documentation Project Review Coordinator (http://www.tldp.org)
Linux Counter Area Manager US:wa (http://counter.li.org)
