discuss: Keeping up-to-date (was Re: Document Lifetimes?)
Subject:
Re: Keeping up-to-date (was Re: Document Lifetimes?)
From:
Emma Jane Hogbin ####@####.####
Date:
13 Nov 2003 04:41:01 -0000
Message-Id: <20031113044003.GB6810@debian>
Just some quick thoughts...
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:34:11PM -0800, Tabatha Marshall wrote:
> 1. Presence of License & Copyright
> 2. Presence of Metadata
> -title
> -author name
> -author email
> -organization (if any)
> -contributors (if any)
> -pub date (month and year)
> -revhistory
> -rev version
> -date of revision
> -author initials
> -revision remarks
> -abstract
- coauthors
> 3. Title and Abstract clearly describe and define document scope
^^^^^^^^ revised item
> 4. Spelling
> 5. Grammar
> 6. Technical accuracy
> 7. Clarity of text
> 8. Organization of material
> 9. Type of markup
- valid markup
10. Original work -- do a quick google search to see if you can find the
same document already online.
--
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]
