discuss: licenses


Previous by date: 13 Nov 2003 02:48:43 -0000 Re: New Reviewers!, Emma Jane Hogbin
Next by date: 13 Nov 2003 02:48:43 -0000 Re: licenses, Guru -
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 13 Nov 2003 02:48:43 -0000 Re: licenses, Guru -

Subject: licenses
From: Rick Meyerhoff ####@####.####
Date: 13 Nov 2003 02:48:43 -0000
Message-Id: <3FB2F157.9040809@eworld3.net>

Since there is discussion of reviewing existing documents and hopefully 
coming up with standard document templates I thought that I would 
mention something. I looked at the GNU Free Documentation License 
(http://www.fsf.org/licenses/fdl.html) and it seems like you must 
include a complete copy of the license in any document that you want to 
be covered by the license. It looks like most HOWTOs refer to the 
license but don't actually include it, and I suspect that is a problem.

And there is something else. The GNU Free Documentation License is not 
on the list of licenses approved by http://www.opensource.org. Is that a 
problem?

I'm still new to this stuff so let me know if I'm off base here.
-- 
Eric (Rick) Meyerhoff



Previous by date: 13 Nov 2003 02:48:43 -0000 Re: New Reviewers!, Emma Jane Hogbin
Next by date: 13 Nov 2003 02:48:43 -0000 Re: licenses, Guru -
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 13 Nov 2003 02:48:43 -0000 Re: licenses, Guru -


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.