discuss: Issue tracking system for reviewers
Subject:
Re: Issue tracking system for reviewers
From:
Franck Martin ####@####.####
Date:
13 Nov 2003 02:01:44 -0000
Message-Id: <1068688875.2790.14.camel@franck-lxnb.sopac.org.fj>
You may even write an HOWTO about it :)
The core functionalities:
-You must be able to submit via e-mail
-You can consult all the bugs via web
-Any posting about a particular HOWTO should be sent to the authors too
as well as recorded in the database.
-bug could be several categories (spelling, incorrect code, addendum,
factual,...)
-you can retrieve all the open bugs of an HOWTO via e-mail
If rt can do it, so it goes...
but I may suggest you look first at other projects like sourceforge
tracking system or on how KDE and Gnome are handling documentation.
Cheers...
On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 13:31, John R. Daily wrote:
> If there is consensus among the reviewers that an issue tracking
> system would be useful, I'd strongly suggest looking at Request
> Tracker (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) over Bugzilla. RT has
> more functionality and seems more flexible.
>
> I've recently installed RT on a Debian woody system, and have a
> long set of notes on the process. I'd be willing to provide
> those and/or help set RT up on a LDP server, should that be
> desirable.
>
> I might even be able to set up RT in my shared hosting
> environment, but I'm not sure it's possible. RT has a specific
> set of requirements that may not be available to me.
>
> --
> John R. Daily
> <email><mailbox>john</mailbox><domain>geekhavoc.com</domain></email>
>
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
--
Franck Martin ####@####.####
SOPAC
