discuss: reviewing all the howtos
Subject:
Re: reviewing all the howtos
From:
"s. keeling" ####@####.####
Date:
12 Nov 2003 18:47:14 -0000
Message-Id: <20031112114238.A24824@infidel.spots.ab.ca>
Incoming from Machtelt Garrels:
>
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, rahul wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 12 November 2003 21:09, Machtelt Garrels wrote:
>
> > > Shall we start by taking out everything that dates from the previous
> > > century, to make the work-list a bit shorter? :)
> >
> > agreed. there are some really really outdated stuff that would take a huge
> > amount of time to clear up. move them off the list immediately and lets take
> > a list of stuff that is *reviewable*
>
> OK, but then we have to contact the authors of the outdated docs and
> tell them what we are doing and why. And with tact.
> So we need two lists:
> - - one holding docs that might still be valid;
> - - another one holding the addresses of all the authors who need to be contacted.
- - authors who have been contacted.
- - authors we're awaiting replies from.
- - authors who could not be found.
- - documents currently being worked on.
- - documents retired/removed.
- - documents that have been updated/survived the process.
[First post to ####@####.#### still in the acceleration lane;
hope this helps.]
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
(*) http://www.spots.ab.ca/~keeling
- -
