discuss: Call for reviewers
Subject:
Re: Call for reviewers
From:
David Lawyer ####@####.####
Date:
24 Mar 2001 15:30:52 -0000
Message-Id: <20010323223110.A153@lafn.org>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 04:44:53PM -0500, David Merrill wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> I am trying to stay on top of all the document submissions and review
> each of them before it goes onto the site. It is WAY more work than I
> am capable of doing, even if I could do it full time. I desperately
> need people willing to go through a submission, comment where it
> needs to be fixed or improved, and send back to the author for
> rewrite.
I think it's important to avoid delays in getting new submissions onto
the site. So I suggest that if there is no one to read over the
entire doc right away, then just sample several percent of the doc.
If it's poor, then send it back to the author. If it's fair, then put
it on the site with a note to the author suggesting a revision in the
near future. Some kind of a list could be kept indicating how badly a
doc needs review (Guylhem called it QC).
David Lawyer
