discuss: Re: ldp-author-tools RPM package
Subject:
Re: ldp-author-tools RPM package
From:
rahul ####@####.####
Date:
3 Nov 2003 19:39:02 -0000
Message-Id: <3FA6AF5C.4010408@yahoo.co.in>
Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:
>
> You're right, Rahul. It is certainly not required. I suggest it (and
> would have loved to have it myself) as a convenience, since by
> installing that one tiny package via up2date (or apt-rpm, or yum, or
> whatever...) I get the ldp.dsl and all the other packages I need
> _automatically_ via dependency resolution. One command, 30 seconds of
> watching the screen, instead of several hours hunting down
> documentation and help which I was mostly too ignorant to understand.
>
>
a single rpm is very convenient. no doubt about that. if we already some
of the required stuff it might be some efficient to split up the
packages and update them thru a shell script or something. dependency
resolution which is hassle free is what you need not a monolothic
package. if someone does build one and you can use that easier then go
ahead and do it. i am talking about ideal solutions. i probably shouldnt
regards
rahul sundaram
