discuss: Re: ldp-author-tools RPM package
Subject:
Re: ldp-author-tools RPM package
From:
"Rodolfo J. Paiz" ####@####.####
Date:
3 Nov 2003 18:40:49 -0000
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031103123758.02471450@mail.simpaticus.com>
At 12:10 11/3/2003, rahul wrote:
>The single rpm isnt really required. If there was a list of rpms or debs
>or whatever listed out clearly authors can just verify the list and make
>sure everything is intact. they can use apt-get or yum to stay updated.
You're right, Rahul. It is certainly not required. I suggest it (and would
have loved to have it myself) as a convenience, since by installing that
one tiny package via up2date (or apt-rpm, or yum, or whatever...) I get the
ldp.dsl and all the other packages I need _automatically_ via dependency
resolution. One command, 30 seconds of watching the screen, instead of
several hours hunting down documentation and help which I was mostly too
ignorant to understand.
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
####@####.####
